Negative Ebola Test For NZ Nurse

The main person or group in the article is the nurse that returned back from Sierra Leone. The nurse was originally from Gore. She was one of the members in the New Zealand team. They were concerned about her health when she came back to New Zealand.

That the nurse that came back after dealing with patients suffering from Ebola, her blood tests came back negative. Meaning that she had no sign of Ebola.

The event took place in New Zealand. This is because the nurse came back from Sierra Leone to New Zealand her blood was tested and she had no sign of Ebola.

The event took place on the 11th of March which was on a Wednesday.

The article describes a member of the NZ team coming back from Sierra Leone after taking care of people with the dreadful disease of Ebola. When she arrived on the 11th of March, she was taken to the Christchurch unit where she was taken after and tested. Her blood was tested to see if she caught the disease. The nurse’s blood was then sent to Melbourne. Melbourne sent it back saying that the tests showed she had no sign of Ebola in her blood.

The event took place in New Zealand. New Zealand is a small country that is surrounded with many seas. New Zealand is most likely an isolated country. This is a country that is the most safest country that anyone could live in because there isn’t much poisonous objects, not many deadly pests and diseases.

This happened on a Wednesday, 11 March 2015. In the future, Ebola might still be a disease that people suffer but if many people are actively helping out today, then the future might just be what many people would want. No Ebola.

It is rare that someone taking care of a patient with Ebola has no sign of Ebola. Whoever wrote the article might wanted to tell people that people can survive while they are dealing with the disease.

By: Liezl